Research Service Learning
The Social Issue Investigation Portfolio
Why Connect Research and Service-Learning?
What are the Benefits of Conducting an RSL Project?
What are the Guiding Principles of RSL?
What Does the General Process of Conducting an RSL Project Look Like?

Research Service Learning

Research Service Learning is an exciting, innovative approach to undergraduate research advocated by the Hart Leadership Program and also supported by a new campus-wide initiative at Duke called Scholarship with a Civic Mission. Research Service Learning is integral to the SOL and Hart Fellows programs.

The faculty and staff of SOL coach interested students on how to work with host organizations to identify the emerging issues and needs in the community that would benefit from sustained study. Students design their research questions and methodologies in collaboration with their supervisors and faculty mentors. Critical reflection is a central part of the RSL experience. Students must document their entire research process and leave a tangible product with their community organization when they complete their internship.

Recent project titles include “Micro-Enterprise development: Business Job Creation, and Community Building in the New South Africa,” “Child Care and Education: Barriers to Self-Sufficiency for Participants in the Supportive Housing Program,” and “Tradeswomen’s Stories, Tradeswomen’s Lives: Oral Histories of Women in Blue Collar Trades.”

Educating Citizens, a book by the Carnegie Foundation for Higher Education describes RSL projects in SOL as “significantly strengthening students’ sense of civic and political efficacy, because they serve such important functions for the agencies.” (p.155, Colby, 2003)


Back to TOP

Social Issue Investigation Portfolios

The Social Issue Investigation Portfolio component of SOL is described well in Educating Citizens (Colby, 2003):

“…each student investigates an issue relating to the internship experience—thus pursuing problem-based, inquiry learning that builds directly on the summer field placements. Students…create portfolios based on the investigation, using research, reflections and other resources to illuminate and focus the issue. Although these reflections and portfolios are individual projects, students have regular, structured opportunities for peer learning in connection with the projects. Each is assigned to a small group that meets regularly to discuss the ongoing social issue investigations, offering suggestions and feedback and helping plan presentations to the class. Then students spend the last seven weeks of the course learning from each other as they take turns presenting their research to the full group. Two elements in the social issue investigation are an interview with an admired practitioner in the student’s field of interest and a memo laying out policy or action recommendations. The memo must grapple with questions like these: “What are the underlying structures or systems that need to change in order to make serious progress on this issue? Who are the key players that need to be involved in the change process? What social policy options do you see? Which option seems most viable? Where do you locate yourself in these proposed actions?”

Back to TOP

Why Connect Research and Service-Learning??

Professor Robert Thompson, Dean of Trinity College, explains the rationale for the Research Service-Learning model:

"Research pedagogies teach students to identify a problem and pose a question, to develop a rigorous investigative approach that involves primary research, and to participate in a process of analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and dissemination. Service-learning, on the other hand, increases understanding of an academic subject or theory through direct service. It involves structured reflection and analysis that connects social and public issues with personal experiences and development. When research is joined with service learning, the outcomes are a deeper level of inquiry-based field research that not only builds leadership and life skills but helps shape students' identities as agents for change and activism in the
community."

While RSL adheres to the same basic principles as traditional academic research, its impact - on both students and the community - can be deeper, more visible and more immediate than much of the research we are accustomed to doing within the academy.

Back to TOP

What are the Benefits of Conducting an RSL Project?


1. We locate ourselves within or in relation to efforts to promote social change.

Like all SOL interns, students engaging in RSL projects gain experience on the "frontlines" of current social change efforts. Through placement with service and activist organizations, we gain insight into strategies being used to confront community challenges and prominent social issues, and, through critical reflection, we locate our place within and in relation to efforts to promote social change.


2. We refine our research skills in contexts where the impact of the research efforts is visible and immediate.

Through the process of designing and conducting a research service-learning project, we hone our critical research skills - a "learning goal" that RSL projects share with student research projects in more traditional academic settings. Yet unlike the research projects students carry out in traditional academic settings, where the impact and importance of students' research is often not immediately apparent, our RSL projects have a practical, immediate impact through contribution to the advancement of our host organizations' social change efforts.

Back to TOP

What are the Guiding Principles of RSL?

The research we do in the context of Research Service Learning, follows the basic research principles of problem identification, methodology selection, execution of research, analysis and synthesis. In addition to these principles, there are specific attributes of the Research Service-Learning Context that set it apart from traditional academic research.

According to the Random House Dictionary, "research" is "diligent and systematic inquiry into a subject in order to discover or revise facts, theories, etc." There is nothing in the definition of research that limits its practice to any specific discipline or methodology, or even to the realm of academia; in fact, we likely engage in some sort of research every day of our lives. This does not mean that each day, we necessarily initiate an academic project; rather, it simply means that we follow a process that adheres to the basic logic and framework of research:

We Pose a Question.
There is something that puzzles us, or a subject about which we wish to know more. Example -- What are the greatest needs facing the youth of the neighborhood served by a certain community organization? We choose or develop an investigative approach to answering the question.

We Develop a Research Methodology.
Once we have identified the problem we want to solve or the question we want to answer, we choose or develop a methodology through which to conduct our investigation. The range of methodologies that can fall under the rubric of "research" is as vast as the range of questions that can be researched. Continuing with the example from above -- Conduct focus groups and a series of interviews with community leaders and community youth to determine what the primary needs are of youth in the community.

We Conduct Our Research.
Over a given period of time, we gather data/findings through execution of the research process.

We Analyze Our Data.
Example -- In focus groups and in individual interviews, community youth and adults alike expressed their belief that a neighborhood park is urgently needed. Throughout the group meetings and interviews, repeated reference was made to a group of adjacent, vacant lots at the center of the neighborhood that appear to offer an ideal locale for the construction of a park.

We Synthesize Our Data and Form Conclusions.
Example -- The community organization should support the construction of a neighborhood park. The organization should direct its funds towards the purchase of the group of vacant lots in the center of the neighborhood, and convert those vacant lots into greenspace for the proposed park.

Research in the Research Service Learning Context
In addition to the basic principles of research, there are specific attributes of Research Service-Learning that set it apart from traditional academic research:

1. Our research is community-based, participatory and action-oriented.

RSL draws on two "alternative" research paradigms that are gaining increasing public attention, even in traditional research universities: "community-based research" and "participatory action research." Community-based research is research conducted "by, with, or for communities." By "communities," we mean more specifically organizations that are rooted in and form an organic part of the communities in which they are present: civic or neighborhood groups, grassroots community organizations, community-centered nonprofits and activist organizations. Within the context of RSL, we always conduct our research in partnership with such organizations.
Participatory action research is research that is focused on finding answers to questions and developing solutions to problems of immediate and practical importance to communities and community groups. In contrast to much typical, academic research, it is "participatory" in that those who have the problem (the community or community group) are not mere "objects" to be studied in an effort of the researcher alone. In a RSL project, we work with the community or community group to identify the problem/question, choose the research methodology and execute the research. Rather than standing apart from the organization and studying it in a disconnected, objectified format, we embed ourselves within the community/community organization to achieve a participatory vantage point (Wadsworth 1998; Masters 1995). Participatory action research - and SOL RSL research - is "action-oriented" in the sense that its explicit purpose is to find answers and develop solutions to problems of immediate and practical importance to the community/community organization. Traditional academic research often seems to hold such action as a tangential goal, or the researcher simply expresses his or her hope that the research will "perhaps one day contribute to" some direct action. In a SOL RSL project, action is central, not tangential; indeed, our research can be viewed as the first step in an action process to be completed after we depart (when recommendations are implemented, findings are used to inform the design of a new program, etc.)

2. We do not seek to eliminate our subjective insights from the research process.

From our vantage point as interns, we gain unique insights into our community organizations' relations to the problem at hand and to the communities in which they are embedded. Rather than discount the insight gained from this subjective perspective, we view it as an asset. Through critical reflection during the research process and in the period of analysis, we can glean insights that may prove useful in the final synthesis. This is not to say that we use our personal biases to distort findings; rather, we identify our subjective insights as such when we utilize them to inform our conclusions/final recommendations.
As researchers, we integrate our critical reflections into our projects in a manner appropriate to the specific methodology we are employing. For example, insights gleaned during a documentary-based project would inform our conclusions - and be presented in a certain way in relation to the "data" - that would be quite different from the presentation of such insights alongside findings gleaned from a quantitative environmental impact study.

3. RSL is a service learning experience. RSL projects engage us in service learning.

Service learning is a form of experiential education that merges the pursuit of student learning activities with those that address significant needs within the community. ... "the goal of service learning is a dynamic partnership between educational institutions and communities' that results in the mutual benefits of learning and meaningful service." (Schaffer and Peterson 1998). "Research," as defined above, is the vehicle through which we engage in service learning.

Back to TOP

What Does the General Process of Conducting an RSL Project Look Like?

1. We identify the objective of our research.

We collaborate with the host organization and the SOL staff to identify a clear objective for our research. The research will respond to a specific need of our host organization. Such needs could include:

 

a. A community nonprofit focused on youth projects needs to assess community opinion on a proposed youth computer-literacy program.
b. A women's community organizing group wishes to assess the degree of organizing activity already present within a community.
c. An environmental activist group wishes to assess whether or not a local factory has been exerting negative effects on environmental conditions in a particular neighborhood through illegal dumping practices.

2. We design the instrument of research. (Week 1-2 of summer placement)

We work with the host organization and the SOL staff to choose or develop a research instrument that will provide for the most effective data collection, given the specific parameters of the research objective. Rather than being limited to choice among a few rigidly defined research methodologies, the methodology will be selected and uniquely adapted to the objective at hand. Depending on the nature of the research objective, the method of research may be primarily qualitative, quantitative, or a relatively even mix of both. However, all RSL research projects engage us in direct interaction with the community served by our host organization. Methodologies could include (but are not limited to):

 

a. The use of qualitative interviews to gather information from a community, (such as for the hypothetical youth computer-literacy project described above).
b. Documentary photography and writing might be used, for example, to gather evidence of environmental damage or perhaps provide evidence of city neglect of inner-city public housing facilities for a community organizing group's campaign to bring about more equitable allocation of public spending.
c. An environmental impact study might be carried out and combined with interviews among residents of communities affected by illegal dumping practices, in preparation for an activist group's attempt to challenge the violators in court.

In addition, we may utilize on-line textual resources to gain additional background into the communities and issues being researched. These resources are used to provide background to and supplement research findings from "the field."

3. We conduct our research. (Weeks 3-7/7.5 of summer placement)

The period in which the research is executed constitutes the bulk of our summer experience. Throughout the research process, we engage in critical reflection on the research process itself, and seek to refine our research strategies in order to most effectively meet the objectives of the research. For example, in the hypothetical project in which a student interviews community members in regards to a new project for community youth, important new questions may be generated through the interviews that the researcher had not initially included in the initial set of interview questions. At an even more fundamental level, the student might discover that, in place of rigidly structured interviews, more loosely structured (yet still guided) interviews are more effective means of generating useful information and insights. This degree of flexibility, grounded in reflection, is critical throughout the research process.


4. We analyze our findings and synthesize our conclusions. (Last 1.5-2 weeks of placement)

We must bring closure to the research process with ample time left for analysis of findings, and synthesis of conclusions. In final form, our product will be presented in a form appropriate to the type of research we have conducted. For all projects, though, the product should respond clearly to the objectives of the research, with presentation of conclusions and recommendations for future action based on these conclusions. Examples:

 

a. An interview project in regards to a community youth initiative might be presented as a report detailing interview findings, followed by analysis of the findings, and conclusions presented in the form of recommendations for future action.
b. An investigation utilizing photography to document environmental damage might include a portfolio of photographs within a final report explaining what conclusions can be drawn from the "evidence" of the photographs, and how this evidence might be used to enhance the investigation.

The product we leave with our host organization includes the findings of the research, the analysis of these findings, and the conclusions and recommendations derived from the findings and analysis. It is more than the final piece of an academic exercise: it is research grounded in action. Research service learning engages us in the work of social change in the present, and simultaneously permits us to contribute to the future social change work that will be carried out by our host organization after our departure. While RSL adheres to the same basic principles as traditional academic research, its impact -- on both us and the community -- can be deeper, more visible and more immediate than much of the research we are accustomed to doing within the academy.

Back to TOP


  Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy        Duke University  

 
 
 

SOL Research Home

SOL Research Projects